Pit Bull Ruling Has Domino Effect

Maryland's Court of Appeals ruled that pit bulls were 'inherently dangerous' earlier this year.

This report was provided by Lyndsey Wallen of Capital News Service.

Do you agree with the Maryland Court of Appeals that pit bulls are "inherently dangerous"? Tell us in the comments.

See also:

  • Court of Appeals Won't Reconsider Pit Bull Decision
  • Pit Bull Bills Appear Headed in Different Directions


Dee November 09, 2012 at 01:54 PM
There are NO bad dogs - only BAD owners.................................
WhiteBeard November 09, 2012 at 05:58 PM
The pit bulls are the same as any other dog
Linda Hoffecker November 09, 2012 at 06:39 PM
No, I do not agree with the ruling. The only reason they are targeted is that they are able to hold onto whatever it is that they are biting, longer and harder than a few other dogs. Little dogs can be kicked away when pitt bulls cannot as a rule.
Bobbi November 09, 2012 at 08:13 PM
I totally agree with the other two comments
patricia williams November 25, 2012 at 06:34 PM
Everybody need to wake the fxxk up these dogs are no more dangerous then any other dog. It is all in how you train people are losing there homes behind this stupid ruling. Why not ban guns they kill people everyday senseless killing.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something