What Are the Key Topics in the May 3 Election?
Patch asks for your help in identifying key issues for candidates to address
Want to play a role in the election?
We want to know what topics you'd like candidates to address.
Parking? Taxes? Development? A new Havre de Grace High School?
You let us know the things you'd like to see the candidates address, and we'll broach those topics with them.
We'll be rolling out pre-election coverage over the next few weeks. Stay tuned, and feel free to follow this column heading in particular. Anything and everything pertaining to the May 3 election will be included under the heading "Havre de Grace Election '11" under our columns.
Any suggestions or concerns? You can email editor Sean Welsh at sean.welsh@patch.com
Curtis Coon
2:24 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011
Isn't the high school determination outside the jurisdiction of the City Council?? Why should this be an election issue if it is outside the Council's jurisdiction?
Curtis Coon
2:25 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011
What is the big deal about enrforcing our current parking laws? Wouldn't that alleviate parking problems except perhaps for certain festivals?
Is there a reason the police do not enforce the parking laws now?
Linda Borneman
6:34 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011
The Lily Run flooding issue needs to be resolved once and for all! All the homes in this low lying area are prone to flooding from a creek that receives much runoff from many storm drains and since it is within the Havre de Grace City limits, residents deserve and need this issue resolved. Just because it is only a portion of residents that are affected, doesn't make it any less valid or important an issue. The City of Havre de Grace must address this issue , one that affects the residents and taxpayers who have been living with this problem for years and years. This is not an issue that is popular or one that brings in revenue from tourism, but one that is often swept under the rug for lack of urgency but it is an urgent problem! I will vote for the candidates who will listen & give thought to a Lily Run resolution.
Tom Fitzpatrick
11:41 pm on Monday, March 28, 2011
I think there already was a resolution. I know that a consulting engineer has mapped the watershed and is at some stage of working on how to address the flooding. I'm not sure how far along this is, or whether funding exists to do the actual work. Haven't heard a peep out of City Hall about it for about a year now.
Tom Barnes
7:17 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
With the cost of fuel constantly rising, I would like the council to address pedestrian traffic. Many things in HdeG are within walking distance but we don't have ease of movement of our pedestrian or bicycle traffic. Specifically, look at foot traffic down 155 (there is an entire community 'trapped' on the MES side of 155 with no choice but to use a car or put their lives in danger on foot or bike going down the hill) . Also, take a closer look at the crossings 'over' 40. Sidewalks, crosswalk buttons and even a pedestrian bridge would be a REALLY good thing - both alliviating congestion, bringing more people downtown without increasing the need for parking and yes, even improving the health of our citizens because we would have better access. I'd also like the council to address sidewalks throughout town where mailboxes are set right in the middle of the walk way. This is not handicap accessible nor is it safe for our children (specifically, take a look once again in the MES resdiential area). How about taking a look at "malfunction junction" (Ohio, 40 & Otsego instersection) and making a 'fix' of that mess. This isn't 1955. The intersection simply does not work any more and it is becoming an increasing danger. I've heard the rumors that with BRACS it will be taken care of but to date nothing has been addressed.
<con't>
Tom Barnes
7:18 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
<con't from above>
Address the traffic on 155 and access for the communities on the quarry side to be able to get out safely. Either have a police cruiser sitting there to catch the people speeding up the hill and 'around the corner' or give us a traffic light. Easy solution is to make Graceview one way INTO the community, move bus traffic down Bern to Eugene and put a light at the end of Eugene onto 155. It is a hideous mess at almost any time of the day - and it is a danger to the parents picking up their kids from MES as well as buses getting out onto 155.
Sara J
8:08 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Lilly Run: I believe the City has been working on this for a long time - looking at all options to pay for such a huge engineering design - including state and federal grant applications. Anything done along Rt 155 or Rt 40 would be through State Highway Administration. Before you vote for any one person that makes a bunch of promises sounding like they are going to cut all your fees and taxes, you must remember these decisions are made by a majority vote of all the elected officials - not just one. Let's think about what has already been accomplished over the past 4 years with the limited funds available - neighborhoods are cleaner and safer, police and fire departments are well equiped, and public information has always been availabe through the City website or simply by calling and asking.
Biller's Bikes
8:13 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Proactive City support of tourism bicycling/hiking, beginning with the proposed Joe K to Susquehanna State Park trail (working with Vulcan Quarry). The Quarry has already made great progress. The HdG to Conowingo bike and hike trail will bring thousands of visiting recreational family cyclists to town to stay in B&B's, dine at our restaurants, and shop in our downtown stores. It's already half there; it's time to get the job done.
John A. Stephens Jr.
8:29 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Pedestrian traffic is a great segway into a gripe of mine. I pick my grandaughter up after school on Juniata and am amazed that no one gets killed there at dismissal time....I also feel like I am in some game of chicken with drivers when I walk my dog and cross Union Ave at crosswalks. A real shame for a tourist driven city.
Biller's Bikes
10:11 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Agree with Mr. Stephens. Havre de Grace is way behind other small cities in modern pedestrian safety, downtown and in the neighborhoods. We need to calm our traffic and make pedestrians comfortable and safe. Signage and enforcement have been neglected. Walter
Bill Lawson
11:45 am on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
I’m all for improving tourism in HdG. I’m going to second what Biller’s Bike said, “Proactive City support of tourism bicycling/hiking” And on a similar note; I’m going to come out and say some of the buildings in town are just plain ugly. That cinder block building on the corner of Pennington and St John is an eye sore. The building where the Stop and Shop was is old, dirty and ugly too. I know knocking down buildings is expensive and impractical, but let’s make some sort of plan to improve and beautify our future. Stop approving ugly.
Bill Lawson
12:15 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Woops, not Stop and Shop, I meant Save a Lot.
John
10:36 am on Monday, April 4, 2011
Unfortunately, the properties you mention are privately owned properties. While I agree with you, you can't just knock them down just because some feel they are ugly.
Curtis Coon
12:32 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Design standards -- should they be part of a new zoning code?
Bill Lawson
1:29 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Writing a code to “not allow ugly” is very subjective, but I’m sure it’s been done many times before. A zoning code that states some percentage of building costs must go to decorative architectural elements is pretty open ended but shows builders that they can’t just build really cheap structures. As an example, let’s consider the One Stop building on Rt 40. It’s a very cheap building with little or no thought for beatification. Whatever kind of steel building that is should be restricted. Adding brick foundation accents and decorative trim would still allow builders to take advantage of these cost effective structures while keeping them looking good.
Curtis Coon
1:04 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Capital Spending -- current budget reflects the following capital expenditures: Lewis Lane and CSX Railroad track, $600,000; Old Bay Lane, federal grant, $700,000; Canvasack Drive, $350,000.00; Hutchins Park, $115,700.
Do you agree that these are the priority areas we should spend our capital improvement money? Obviously, the Old Bay Lane is not exactly city money, as it is a federal grant, but what about the rest???
Tom Barnes
1:09 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Mmmmmmmm - I can't see why Canvasback needs $350,000 in improvements/repair. That is one that I would have to question. Don't they have a HOA that is suppose to provide for upkeep, etc. of their community? We have plenty of communities without HOA's that need road repair.
Bill Lawson
1:53 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Canvasback is a public road that goes through a community with an HOA. It's not owned by the HOA.
Tom Barnes
2:25 pm on Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Gotcha, thanks :)
Ellen Eltgroth
7:24 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
I'd like to see the city government encourage a grocery store to open in Havre de Grace again, as has happened in Fallston. I miss having one I can walk to!
Maybe an Aldi's?
Brent
10:40 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011
Aldi is probably an excellent fit as a replacement in town for Save-A-Lot. (Although personally I would rather see something substantial as well to take on Weis.)
Philip Hutson
7:39 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
The most important matter for HDG at this time is the water and sewer issue. Will the proposed 10% rate increase be a long term solution? Has the City done all it can do to provide an efficient w/s operation? W/S affects every resident, business, and visitor of HDG and therefore should be a priority for the HDG government.
Curtis Coon
11:24 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
The situation has more to do with the debt stucture incurred that enabled the City to comply with Chesapeake Bay regs and capacity than the effeciency of the operation itself. We have an oversized plant because of the housing decline, that's about it. How do we deal with it? One way is to raise water rates, probably more than 10%. Another is to consider water and sewer hookup fees, currently the highest by far of any jurisdiction in Harford County. Builders are going to Beechtree, for example instead of Bulle Rock, due in large part to tax and hookup fees. I am far from convinced that the fees HdG charges for hookup are supported by empirical study. All told, it costs a developer in HdG close to $33,000 in hookup and other fees (including county school tax). So, the election issue is, "Should Havre de Grace lower its hookup fees to attract development of lots that are already approved within the current City limits?"
Curtis Coon
11:27 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Another election issue: "Should the City's payroll, number of employess, staffing be: 1. increased; 2. decreased or 3. remain the same?"
Molly O'Brian
9:33 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Havre de Grace has a well deserved reputation of being unfriendly to business. I'd like to hear the candidates explain their views on economic development, and how city government can encourage and support existing businesses while working to bring new business to the city.
Tom Fitzpatrick
9:33 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011
The elephant in the room that is our water and sewer system certainly is a major issue. We have incurred a huge debt that is well beyond the capabilities of 12000 people to pay. Soaking developers has driven business away, as has the generally anti development attitude of the current adminstration.
Right now, we are writing grants applications to pay the interest on the loans we have. That ain't sound fiscal policy!
Unfortunately, I gather from the rumor mill that some people are trying to scare city employees (particularly at the water and sewer plants) into believing that they are going to be targets of some sort of big layoff if things change in town. This is not true to my knowledge.
Canvassback Drive has been falling apart almost since it was surfaced years ago.
I do not know what the $115K for Hutchins Park is for. We spent $350 getting it to its current state not ten years ago.
Linda Borneman
12:06 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011
I'd like to address the Water & Sewage issue...first, I do not believe that most of the residents of HdG know why the Wastewater Treatment Plant was upgraded, causing the rate increase. This upgrade was mandated by the state environmental agency (MDE) that regulates them...the upgrade ensures more nutrient removal which in turn, cleans up the Chesapeake Bay. Plus the upgrade was long overdue because of the antiquated equipment (much of this equipment such as in the main pumping station, and the main clarifier itself, was installed in 1965!), so the added housing developments on the hill and surrounding HdG put a strain on the antiquated equipment, causing many breakdowns, repairs and replacements. It was clear that this upgrade was imminent on many levels. The state, in my understanding, gave HdG a grant to help with the cost of this upgrade, but I do believe that the grant did not cover the full expense of this upgrade, so the taxpayers had to fill the gap. Unfortunately, they are not happy with the increase in water & wastewater rates, but someone has to pay for the upgrade, and as long as people are benefitting from wastewater treatment, then it just makes sense they they absorb the cost...it is a service to the community & the environment, after all!
Linda Borneman
12:09 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011
The person that mentioned that the mindset of the present HdG administration as "anti-development" is not a fair assessment, in my opinion. I have to say that in the last 10 years, I have seen enormous development in HdG...from the towering new condo building down by the lighthouse, to the vast sprawl on the hill, HdG has grown by leaps and bounds. We need to be mindful of this "growth" regarding our schools, hospital, police, public works and how they can support more growth.
Havre de Grace is my childhood home, my adult home and if it is to be my senior home, I hope that it retains its "small town flavor" as it strives to make improvements in the life of it's residents. It is a balancing act and one that must be done with maintaining the integrity & the charm of HdG...the very thing that attracts so many people to call it home.
Rolando
4:16 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011
I love the idea of a new HdG high school with a magnet program.
I also love the idea about a grocery co-op in downtown HdG.
The city must somehow address the "cut through" traffic through the Grace Manor development between Chapel and US 40. While I'm sure the Lewis Lane extension and connection to Chapel was planned, the way it cuts through this development was poorly designed and implemented.
Curtis Coon
11:15 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011
When it comes to the High school and the grocery, just about all the City can do is fill the role of Cheerleader. It cannot do very much about either save encouragement. I am a big advocaate of the idea of a magnet program or, my personal favorite, a plain old fashioned high school that ie the envy of the County because no one can understand why its students do so very well when it comes to receiving four year college scholarships!
However, the City does have jurisdiction over Lewis Lane, so that's actually more on point to this article. The problem is purely and simply poor, poor, poor planning. I am not sure what can be done other than restrict the road to residents of the locality, but that would mean they're no longer public, so that's out, because one thing people don't vote in favor of is paying for their own streets. It is odd that there is both an outcry about the use of Lewis Lane and an outcry to use 350K in the budget to improve it. It seems to me that speed humps and potholes are the only two things that deter traffic, neither of which cost that much money. The cost of redirecting traffic on a wholesale basis would be prohibitive. Has anyone done a traffic study to see how bad the traffic is as compared to other roads in town?
Brent
1:48 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011
Even though the only way to positively fix the Grace Manor/ Havre de Hill traffic issue requires far more the 350K and probably some eminent domain. That said, Lewis Lane/Grace Manor Dr could definitely stand for some improvement, starting at the very least with going through and painting double yellow lines throughout.
Another potential solution at least as Havre de Hills is concerned is to make Lewis and Lori one-way streets: split them where they meet, making Lori southbound only, and making Lewis northbound only between where it meets both ends of Lori Lane. This would give the space that could allow for the curbside parking residents have clamored for there.
Tom Fitzpatrick
12:17 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011
Havre de Hills was permitted the way it was under the specific understanding that Lewis would remain all no parking, which is why it's only 18' wide. The city allowed the developers to configure the subdivision more like a typical row house community with allys in the back and rear parking.
Both Bayview Estates and Bulle Rock were originally configured on the assumption that they would eventually connect to a Lewis Lane Extended. Had that been done, residents of both communities could drive to Lewis Lane and enter Rt 40 or go downtown without ever having to drive on Chapel Road or Rt 155. There is still enough open land to make this happen. All we need is a commitment to do it.
There has also been a lot of flack here about the water plant. A number of people seem to be highlighting the BNR upgrades which were done several years ago, and soft peddling the significantly larger, and more expensive upgrades to the plant's capacity.
The BNR improvements are, by far the least of our problems, yet seem to get the most mention here. The enlarged capacity, done in anticipation of the build out of Bulle Rock, and other as yet unspecified growth, is by far the larger financial burden, and the one that is causing the most worries.
Philip Hutson
5:40 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011
Could you elaborate on the open land for a potential Lewis Lane extension?
Brent
7:51 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011
Well for one, Halls Rd (the gravel lane that diverges Lewis just after the RR crossing) could easily be realigned, improved and connected to the dead end of Hall Court in The Woods at Bayview. And Spinnaker Way could also just as well be extended the cross the tracks and directly connect to Rt 40 just beyond the developed portion of the Harbor Shops ( it is certainly wide enough to permit easy two-way traffic.) And there is probably a way to make a spur off of Brian Garth too, provided they could purchase the private property blocking that route.
Lititia Fenner
9:32 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011
If this was done, how would the residents be able to back out of their parking? Parking alines the roads. Also this area is private property. What would be the plan to allow this?
Wade
11:38 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011
So, nobody wants to elaorate on any plans that may be already in the works for this? Would like to know from city council members what their plans are for this road.
Tom Fitzpatrick
12:23 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011
As I recall, the original idea was to connect Lewis Lane to what is now a dead end just down from the townhouses (Whitney Way or Willow Way, I forget which. When Bulle Rock was origninally platted, the cul-de-sac now called Oak Tree Drive was supposed to continue down that side of Lilly run to near where the bottom of Bulle Rock Parkway is now (that was originally supposed to be the second golf course).
The possibility of crossing the railroad at a second point is not realistic. It is nearly impossible to gain right of way access to cross railroad tracks.
Brent
12:58 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011
They should forgo a direct crossing and build a bridge over the tracks if they could at a new point...but I know the idea is pure fantasy in regards to securing funding for such infrastructure.
Anna Anders
1:22 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011
Now this is real community involvement! I hope the politicians are listening . There are some great thoughts listed above. Seems like our city government gets bogged down in committees and studies and when it comes time for decisions they just don't get done. I'd like to see some teeth in our city council and some real leadership that is willing to make real decisions on all the subjects that have been mentioned above.Whatever happened to the zoning "study" and proposed changes that was being worked on this past year? Where is our final city comphrehensive plan that outlines our vision and goals for the future? We have a lot of "staffers" in our city government that do a lot of "thinking". I believe we can do with less thinking and more "getting the jobs done". Cut back on administration and divert that payroll money to things that directly benefit the taxpayers.
Curtis Coon
6:28 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011
I am very interested in what the candidates think about this traffic situation that seems to be troubling people who live around Chapel Road and Lewis Lane, where the perceived cut-throughs are occurring. There are several options.....
Dot Hines
11:16 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011
I would like to know how each candidate feels about releasing information about campaign contributions and campaign spending. I've never seen anything released about this for the local Havre de Grace elections, and only lately have learned that it's not required. I think voters should have that information as part of their decision making. Would any of the candidates in this election be willing to disclose this information? If one person does it, it might encourage others to do so.
Miles Konopka
11:41 am on Sunday, April 10, 2011
Id like to have the candidates establish a"specific focused alternative energy plan". This plan would be part of the town's best practices and would be applied against every element of it's expense. Preparing a "creative approach" to sound fiscal government is the request. Offset some of those energy bills with solar, wind and tidal currents. Reward the citizen partisapants. Publisize the achievements and promote tourism through its results. "if you build it they will come"."
Amber Woods
12:13 pm on Sunday, April 10, 2011
I'm with Miles on this! Thanks for voicing such an important issue.
Lauren L.
11:52 pm on Sunday, April 10, 2011
More shopping in the area would be nice -- I'm tired of having to drive a half an hour to get errands done. A dog park in the area would be great!
Rolando
8:28 am on Thursday, April 14, 2011
Candidates should definitely address how to attract more commercial/retail to the city. And all commercial uses must fit the scale and character of the city - whether it's located in "Old Town" Havre de Grace or on US 40. Candidates should also address working with State Highway towards beautifying the US 40 corridor.
Smoking should be banned at Tydings Park - especially during special events (such as the 4th of July Celebration and Friday night concerts).
The walking and bicycling elements of the Comprehensive Plan should be implemented - especially the Old Town Loop and the Old Town/New Town Bikeway.
Candidates whould address extracurricular youth programs in the schools and enhancing the towns arts and entertainment ammenities.
Rolando
6:03 am on Friday, April 15, 2011
I'd like to see public transportation in HdG - something to shuttle residents around the city and maybe connect with the train stations in Aberdeen and Perryville.
I'm also interested in know what the Candidates thoughts are on a city annexation/growth management plan.
Sara-Jayne Walker
2:00 am on Thursday, April 21, 2011
In all of these discussions I feel Linda Borneman has touched on my greatest concerns. As someone who was born and raised in Havre de Grace, I can agree with her sentiments of "small town flavor". What makes this town such an incredible place to live and raise a family in are the people that live here. I have seen what happens to a "quaint" little place when "city" people transplant. They move to the little place, want to get involved to help make improvements and before you know it BOOM! Bel-Air!!! I want a candidate that cares about our home-town and the residents, that care about not just being here but living here. Not a candidate that is trying to better their business, or is looking for that "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" deal. Anyone have a suggestion?