Should Havre de Grace Alter Election Process?
Elections are held annually with at-large positions for council and mayor.
Should Havre de Grace consider altering its election process?
It's a healthy discussion, and one that came up repeatedly during this year's election season.
The election schedule—two-year terms held on a rotating, annual basis—was questioned.
So too was the at-large positions for council and mayor.
Should there be voting districts?
"There's pros and cons to that," recently-elected Councilman Joseph Smith told Patch in an interview about a month before the election. "Where do you draw them? And people say one reason to do that is so that no one community gets control. It also guarantees that different sides of the community get represented. There are pros and cons there."
I want to hear your thoughts. Leave a comment below.
I compiled the residences of the past 10 candidates elected to office in Havre de Grace—including the two newcomers from last week's election, and those outgoing officials from both this year's election and last spring's election.
While this sample size offers only a small window into the candidates that run for office—it represents all of those elected in the Havre de Grace Patch era, dating back to October 2010—it does offer some insight into the widespread representation that the current council offers.
Some residents recommended full district-driven elections, while others recommended two, three or four districts with the other seats up for an at-large election.
As it currently stands, the city elects its officials every two years, with three council members up for election every year, and the mayor's seat up for election on the odd-numbered years.
In an interview in the month leading up to the May 8 election, Fred Cullum, who was seeking his ninth term after 16 years as a City Council member, said two-year terms were too short.
"I'm not a fan of two year terms. I think two-year terms are detrimental to getting things done," Cullum said. "The first year, a new person is learning, the second year, they're running for re-election."
Aberdeen recently changed from two-year to four-year terms for its elected officials. Four council members ran un-opposed in Aberdeen in November 2011, while two candidates squared off for the mayor's seat.
Cullum said a movement to push for four-year terms would have to go to referendum and be placed on the ballot for the public to vote.
In an interview about two weeks prior to the election, Mayor Wayne Dougherty said he feels Havre de Grace does elections the right way.
"I think here in the city we have the best election system going," Dougherty said. "A lot of people use the excuse that we need four year terms because we may just be getting things going. ... Our election system that we have in Havre de Grace, in two years anyone can clearly demonstrate what they're working on, what they've accomplished and what's the eventual outcome. If you can give that to the citizens, they understand. They'll give you another shot."
TELL US: Are you happy with the way Havre de Grace runs its elections? What would you change, if anything? Leave a comment.
James P. Miller
1:26 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
I have always supported longer terms. The council has voted to change the length of the council terms in the past to three years, but there are always those that are afraid of change and rally the forces against it. The last plan was to have three year staggered terms for council and the mayor. Three council elected the first year, three the second year and the Mayor the third year running for a three year term. This would allow all the councilmember's to run for mayor without giving up their seats. Another proposal I would support is to have more voting places. I have suggested moving the election date to the November General election. The Board of Elections could prepair special ballots for Havre de Grace only voters not everyone in district 6. More people come out for the big elections, where I believe many people forget about the city election. The object here is to get the vote out and make it convenient for the voters. Those running for office would have to work harder by manning more voting locations. I'm not sure in district elections are needed. Maybe an elected Council President to preside over the City Council meeting.
Fred Cullum
11:10 pm on Tuesday, May 15, 2012
I cannot let this go by without expressing my views on the subject. Starting with the terms, I absolutely believe that 2 year terms do not serve the citizens well. I have long been a supporter of longer terms. Space here does not allow for explaining the many reasons that I believe this. I do believe that the time has come for the creation of Council Districts. I would favor 4 members elected by district and 2 at large. As was stated above there are pros and cons, one con being that there could be an election that one or more districts did not have anyone interested in running for Council. This could result in someone that really did not have the passion and interest in running, being talked into it and then not putting forth the effort to properly represent the citizens. I also believe that we should have more separation between the Executive and the Legislative branches of our City Government. I would like to see the Council President elected at large and sit as the presiding officer of the meetings of the City Council. Again not room for the multitude of reasons I think these changes would better serve our citizens. These are not new ideas, we discussed these topics at length in 1997 when I chaired the Charter Review Task Force. Although we brought forth many changes that updated many sections of the Charter, it was felt at that time, that the City had not grown enough to need those changes. However, I think it is now time to seriously consider at least some of them.
Paula Casagrande / Big House Signs
8:20 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Fred and Jim, I absolutely agree. Especially as the city grows I think it is important that all parts of the city be represented. And two years is not long enough, even though it's not in my best interest since I get business every year from these elections. Plus moving election day to match up with state or federal elections would get more people out to vote. It's embarrassing the turnout we get on our local elections. (And to Kareem your comment makes no sense. Number one, Jim and Fred's comment were not condescending and if the terms were longer they'd have to wait longer before they could run again.) I'd be interested to learn how we can get this to referendum.
Hans-Adam III, Prince of Liechtenstein
1:59 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
@Paula Cassagrande
I don't know you, but I am curious if you did accept the terms of a loan from the City of Havre de Grace, whether you are current with your payments and in compliance with the terms of that loan? If not the city should pursue the money you owe Havre de Grace.
Kareem N Mikoffee
9:54 pm on Sunday, May 20, 2012
The sound of crickets can only mean one thing............
Bruce Linick
8:23 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Why don't we add term limits into the discussion?
Cindi
8:58 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
If we are going to make terms 4 years instead of 2, we should also have term limits. Otherwise I would not support the change.
Fred Cullum
9:39 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
We already have term limits, they are also know as elections.
William Watson
9:25 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
This matter is one that has come up time and time again in the past and is certainly worth a meritorious discussion. Although there are several reasons on both sides of the issue to be considered, it doesn't serve the public or the civility of discussion to impugn the integrity of those making either case. Our founding fathers considered legislator's terms extremely carefully and the bicameral solution they codified in the Constitution takes into consideration many of the factors identified in these brief posts and many that are not.
Regarding in-district elections, I would hesitate to support any system that would encourage a small city such as HdG to be divided along lines of neighborhoods, class or some other political identity. Representation in HdG should be global and identity politics, while, unfortunately, ever-present on a national level, should have no foothold in our fair city.
Sean Welsh
9:59 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
A comment from Kareem N Mikoffee was deleted for violation of the terms of use. -Sean
Kareem N Mikoffee
10:09 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Cullum was in office for 16 years and voted out. How much more time does he want in office? Also is Big House Signs still in default on there city loan? Look into that Patch?
Sean Welsh
10:14 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
For those who didn't read the article, the quotes within the story were made well in advance the election. I conducted the interviews on this topic in that fashion for that very reason. Also, I've spoken with Mr. Cullum and Mr. Miller on this topic before, and I can say that both of their stances on this topic remain unchanged since the election. Finally, personal attacks against commenters will be deleted. Thanks.
Mr. Watson: I agree, it's a topic that deserves legitimate discussion.
-Sean
Paul Callahan
10:14 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
OK, Kareem N Mikoffee's comment was rude and showed no class. I agree that it should have been taken down. And with a name like that it obviously was a fake name. But I can't help but ponder the other predominant fake name on the Patch: Hans the III Prince of Lechtinstien. That person continually insults people and never has his posts deleted. He has called the current mayor of Havre de Grace stupid and other insults many times and his post never get deleted. So....what's the fundamental difference between calling the mayor stupid and calling two councilmen election losers? Both comments in that nature are inappropriate and should be deleted. Or, if truth be told, maybe the mayor is stupid and the two councilmen are election winners.....not losers....and the Patch knows something we don't.
Sean Welsh
10:20 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Paul: Thanks for the comment. The "fake name" issue is a frustrating one for me. I take into account the context of each comment and a variety of factors when pulling one. Also, to clarify: I have deleted multiple comments from the other user in question. -Sean
Hans-Adam III, Prince of Liechtenstein
1:53 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
@Paul Callahan -
Just to be clear I think Wayne Doughtery in his capacity as mayor does a poor job of managing and administering the city's business. Havre de Grace deserves better!
If you don't like my opinion tough luck, buddy!
Paul Callahan
3:00 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Hans, my man...or should I say woman, your opinion doesn't matter when you hide behind a fake name. Besides, you've said enough already. I think we all know who you are.
Hans-Adam III, Prince of Liechtenstein
6:49 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
@Paul Callahan
Opinions they do vary.
Lost in HdG
4:37 pm on Saturday, May 19, 2012
I agree with the fake name issue! If you are not man or women enough to use your real name do not post and if so it should be deleted! Kind of like having the right to face your accuser in a court! Two perfect examples of users needing deleted and not allowed to post and I am sure there is many more! (Kareem N Mikoffee, Hans-Adam III, Prince of Liechtenstein) really makes makes me want to not support the patch and ask SEVERAL people I know to do the same!!!!!!! See how fast this get's deleted!
Kareem N Mikoffee
10:25 am on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
The council members are indeed elections losers and as long time politicians they both saw their future was to be voted out. How much more time does the guy want in office? Let's see what the new blood brings to the table.
Hans-Adam III, Prince of Liechtenstein
1:42 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Mayor Wayne Doughtery likes the status quo of the current council and mayoral terms. It keeps him in power, which is in my opinion a travesty since Wayne's leadership or lack thereof has hurt the citizens and taxpayers,
Besides who likes attending council meetings and having to endure Wayne Doughtery's perpetual election campaign awards ceremonies? I suggest if Wayne wants to have monthly awards ceremonies pick another date and keep council meetings strictly business. Oh and Wayne people don't like your cute jokes when giving out awards...we've heard them all and they weren't funny the first time you said them.
Kareem N Mikoffee
3:05 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
One of our founding fathers Ben Franklin published under assumed names all the time and if our godly friend, Paul would read some of his writings he may get the vapors and pass out from their vitriol. Dear Paul nearly had a heart attack because I stated election losers were in fact losers. As for the Mayor, to be charitable, I hold him in low regard.
Bob
2:14 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I believe 2 years is too short just based on observations on the speed of decision making and getting things done Members aren't appointed, they are voted in. I don't really see the downside of longer terms as long as they are staggered. Term limits? Sure the voting process in and of itself should take care of that.
Regina Blake
7:51 pm on Friday, September 21, 2012
well i never voted for people in havre de grace, because I never knew when the election came or who was running until the last minute. can you exolain why, I live in the village.
Regina Blake
5:53 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
why was the question so inappropriate, its the truth. can anyone explain it? also I need to know where do you get the ballots to vote from home is you are diaable?
Fred Cullum
7:22 pm on Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Elections in Havre de grace have been held on the First Tuesday after the First Monday in May for many years. Absentee ballots can be obtained from the County Election Board in Forest Hill. What Village do you live in?? If you live in Webster Village you cannot vote in the city elections.