patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Same-Sex Marriage: How'd Your Senator Vote?

Patch breaks down how each Harford-based state senator voted Thursday.

 
0 of 0
Sen. Nancy Jacobs, Republican, Harford County.
Photos (2)

Photos

Sen. Barry Glassman, Republican, Harford County.

The State Senate on Thursday passed same-sex marriage legislation.

State delegates narrowly passed it last week, despite votes against from the entire Harford County delegation.

See how your Harford County-based state senators voted:

Senator Party District Vote
J.B. Jennings
Republican 7 Against
Nancy Jacobs
Republican 34 Against
Barry Glassman
Republican 35 Against

Join our live chat on the debate.

TELL US: Are you content with your senator's vote? Leave a comment.

Related Topics: Barry Glassman, Harford County Government, Maryland General Assembly, Nancy Jacobs, and same-sex marriage maryland

Edward Heydt

9:11 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

This is a sad day for marriage and a moral society.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

10:23 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

This is a great day for marriage equality in Maryland!!

Comment_arrow

Dave Lam

12:09 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

a sad day for marriage is everyday someone gets a divorce or gets married for 3 days then divorces. that some real sanctity!

Emily Ellis

9:28 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

I don't understand what is wrong with people. The narrow minded thinking or this area sickens me. I'm glad it passed, it shouldn't have been an issue. Same sex marriages shouldn't be discriminated against any more than inter racial marriage or ANY kind of marriage. What it comes down to is people expressing their love. If anyone was trying to force you to do something you didn't want to do, I'd see the problem. No one is forcing you to marry someone of the same sex so why do you care? If it is against the bible and it is wrong the only one who should be judging the decision that two people make is God. Not you on your high horse.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Karl Schuub

7:52 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Having sex with someone of the same gender is hardly the same as having sex with someone of another race? My dog doesn't even have sex with the neighbors dog...they're both boys, but he sure is interested in that little poodle across the road. It has nothing (at least to me) to do with the bible, but moreso the slow erosion of basic civility and a moral core that contributes to a healthy society. Really could care less who's having sex with who, but hardly think that state should sanction basically an unnatural act as equal to that which produces healthy families.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:42 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Karl - Being gay is unnatural? Homosexual behavior has been observed in over 1000 species. I would say that Mother Nature loves the gays!

Barbara Snyder

9:36 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Sad day? I think not. Judging people as immoral because they may not believe as you do, now that's sad.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

tinbon434

5:42 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

How do you get around the scriptures­? Do you think God will change for you? The Bible states Leviticus 18:22 You shall not lie with male as with a woman. It is an abominatio­n.

1 Corinthian­s 6:9–10 Do you not know that the unrighteou­s will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. eNeither fornicator­s, nor idolaters, nor adulterers­, nor homosexua­ls, nor sodomites­, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortione­rs will inherit the kingdom of God.

Romans 1:26–27 26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. You are getting by but not away. After death comes judgement for everyone. G­ay or Straight.

Comment_arrow

Dave Lam

12:20 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Hey tinbon434, read and quote the whole bible and not just what suites your needs. we do have other abominations in the bible start ranting about them. it is an abomination to eat anything from the sea that does not have scales. do you enjoy your crabs and oysters?

Megan

10:05 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Couldn't agree more Barbara!

Every human should be entitled to the same rights!! It doesn't matter what there sexual preference is. As long as the couple is happy, they should be able to all the things "so called normal" couples do.

I can garuntee the majority of your marriages are not as perfect as you like to portray!!

Mr. Heydt you should be ashamed of yourself! You should be preaching tolerance and love.. Not continuing to preach hatred!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy Stapleton

11:15 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Hatred? Where in Mr. Heydt's comment is the word/term "hate" used? It is liberals like you that throw the hate word out whenever someone disagrees with your liberal ideologies.

Comment_arrow

Jennifer Lewis

9:40 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Gay people DO have the same rights as straight people. They are allowed to marry someone of the opposite sex as are straight people. By the same token, straight people are not allowed to marry someone of the same sex. These are not "equal" rights for which thy are asking. They are asking for "gay" rights or "special" treatment. I wish they would stop painting their desire for gay marriage as an act of discrimination. Marriage is between a man and a woman. If they want to have a legal bond of some sort with someone of the same sex, they need to ask for a law with a new term and acknowledge it's seperation or difference from the institution of marriage.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:44 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Jennifer - Straight people are allowed to marry who they love, gays are not. That is not equal.

Kevin Sudano

10:18 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

This is another Reason added to the many why I completely despise this county and from some of the comments I have seen left many of the people in it. These senators make me sick.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jessica

8:15 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Dont worry Kevin there are so many wonderful opened minded people around here and guess what ?! were not going anywhere . . . and we are all raising our children to know what it means to love and treat others with kindness & equality :)

Casey A

10:26 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Thank you to every legislator who had the courage to vote for this bill. You have helped Maryland become a more just state that no longer discriminates against our LGBT citizens!

Reply
Comment_arrow

St. John's Episcopal Church

6:47 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

This from a marvelous website:

1. If Jesus did not mention a subject, it cannot be essential to his teachings.
2. You are not being persecuted when prevented from persecuting others.
3. Truth isn’t like wine that gets better with age. It’s more like manna you must recognize wherever you are and whoever you are with.
4. You cannot call it “special rights” when someone asks for the same rights you have.
5. It is no longer your personal religious view if you’re bothering someone else.
6. Marriage is a civil ceremony, which means it’s a civil right.
7. If how someone stimulates the pubic nerve has become the needle to your moral compass, you are the one who is lost.
8. To condemn homosexuality, you must use parts of the Bible you don’t yourself obey. Anyone who obeyed every part of Leviticus would rightly be put in prison.
9. If we do not do the right thing in our day, our grandchildren will look at us with same embarrassment we look at racist grandparents.
10. When Jesus forbade judging, that included you.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

9:16 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

St. John's Episcopal Church - Well said!

Brian Ferri

10:33 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

I'm ECSTATIC it passed! It's no wonder why Harford County was the last county to desegregate. I cannot wait to vote them out of office.

Reply

Megan

11:26 pm on Thursday, February 23, 2012

Oh excuse me, he did not say hate! However by pointing out it is a sad day for marriage and moral society was just a nice way of saying it!!

Yes I am a liberal and very proud of it!!! I teach my children to love people for what they are. Doesn't matter what skin color, religious beliefs or sexual orientation they are!!!

When you are in a position of power such as representing God, you should teach tolerance! Not openly condemn something you don't believe in! Or maybe just scared to except!! Maybe some of you have some skeletons in your closets!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Randy Stapleton

12:09 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

I don't know Mr. Heydt- it sounds as if you do and that he is a minister or associated with the Christian faith. If so, yes, he does represent God and God's will for all people. I invite you to read Matthew 16:23. Then go to Matthew 22:34-40. It is good to know that you will teach your children to love. I will pray that you are successful. Best regards. R

Comment_arrow

tinbon434

5:44 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

God says NO. He doesn't teach tolerance. How do you get around the scriptures­? Do you think God will change for you? The Bible states Leviticus 18:22 You shall not lie with male as with a woman. It is an abominatio­n.
1 Corinthian­s 6:9–10 Do you not know that the unrighteou­s will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. eNeither fornicator­s, nor idolaters, nor adulterers­, nor homosexua­ls, nor sodomites­, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortione­rs will inherit the kingdom of God.

Romans 1:26–27 26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. You are getting by but not away. After death comes judgement for everyone.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

10:10 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

tinbon434 - The Bible does not condemn homosexuality when it is put in historical and cultural context and read using reason, as Jesus did. Let's look at the Scripture you quoted.

You quoted Leviticus as condemning homosexuality because the Scripture says, "Thou shalt not lie with mankind as with womankind; it is an abomination." As a gay man, I do not have s e x with women, I have s e x with men. Thus, I do not lie with mankind as with womankind. This Scripture was not intended to condemn homosexuality.

You say that 1 Corinthians 6:9 condemns homosexuality. The King James translation states, "9Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God."
This does not refer to homosexuality. It may condemn effeminate men, but there are effeminate straight and gay men just as there are masculine straight and gay men.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

10:14 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

tinbon434 - As for Romans 1:26-27, you need to Paul's letter to the Romans in context. In Romans 1:21-28, Paul talks about people who refused to acknowledge and glorify God (v. 21), the worshipping of idols (v23), people who were more interested in earthly pursuits than spiritual pursuits (v.25), people who gave up their natural, innate passion for the opposite sex in search of pleasure (v. 26-27), and people who live lives full of covetousness, malice, envy, and hatred of God (v. 29-31).

Homosexuality is a natural part of human sexuality (for verification, check out the APA website). This reference is talking about heterosexual people who gave up their natural orientation to have s e x with people of the same gender in what Paul calls, "Their search for pleasure." It is not talking about gay people who naturally are attracted to people of the same gender.

One verse in Romans you might want to look up is Romans 2:1 which says, "Therefore you are inexcusable, O man, whoever you are who judge, for in whatever you judge another you condemn yourself; for you who judge practice the same things."

Joe McCarthy

12:42 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Look at that picture. She looks confused,beaten,and miserable! And she should be! As well as ed and randy! When you all line up in front of the man you will find out how you have perverted his words! Shame on you small minded miserable people that have nothing better to do than try to prevent people from being happy! Why do teabaggers and conservatives hate America so much? Move to China!

Reply

MdNatureGirl

7:23 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Just because people do not agree with you and do not give you what you want or seek does not make them bad people. People do not hate you just because they disagree with you. The majority of people in general disagrees with you. Nobody is preventing you from being happy. Why is material and money always linked to peoples happiness? I am proud of our reps for voting against it. They have to do what they feel is for the greater good and that is not always going to be well received. What will be next? 3 and 4 people of the same sex considered a family unit? So , we won't be able to acknowledge Mother's Day and Father's Day because we will offend someone! WTC! Stop the stupidity!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:46 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

MdNatureGirl - According to a recent Washington Post poll, more people in Maryland support gay marriage than disagree with it.

Comment_arrow

Joe McCarthy

2:19 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Do you really believe that? Take your head out of the sand,the Majority disagree with you. It doesent matter how many times you say it,its still not true! Where do you get your info from,the 700 club? Do you hate your country(that was built on tolerance) so much that let people be what they want to be! And talk about stupidity,this costs nobody any money! The greater good,for who? Nancy had been asleep for 10 years until she decided to run for office now we see her all over,talk about material and money! Go back to sleep!

Local Girl

7:30 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Thanks you Harford County for trying to not allow this to pass. I support your against vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:46 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Then you are supporting discrimination.

Janice

7:37 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Thank you Senators for voting the right way. I am just sorry it passed. When God made Adam he made a female wife for him named Eve. He did not make another male. If God had intended the human race to be fulfilled through both heterosexual and homosexual marriage, He would have designed our bodies to allow reproduction through both means and made both means of sexual intercourse healthy and natural. Homosexual intercourse carries a high risk of disease, this is recognized in Scripture where gay men are said to receive in their bodies the due penalty for their error (Romans 1:27). Just because the bill passed does not make it right. Everyone has a choice and an opinion. I am sticking with God's Word.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MdNatureGirl

8:52 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Well said! There are certain creatures that were created that way. Man however is not one of them.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:48 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Janice Hash - I am a Christian, but I recognize that since this bill is about civil marriage, not religious marriage, what the Bible says is irrelevant.

Jessica

8:07 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

I am so thankful for the people who voted for Marriage Equality!!!! This is a great day for Maryland. GO MARYLAND!!!!!!!

Reply

Roger Thompson

8:34 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

And how do you spell R-E-F-E-R-E-N-D-U-M?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:49 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Civil rights should not be put to a public vote. If they were, much of the south would still be segregated. The rights of the minority must be protected from the tyranny of the majority.

Comment_arrow

Joe McCarthy

1:39 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

How do you spell i-n-v-a-l-i-d-a-t-e-d ! Maybe alabama would like to put slavery up for referendum! Wait,did'nt they try that one in CA.? Hard to keep up from the bunker?

Comment_arrow

St. John's Episcopal Church

6:53 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

One spells it exactly as you have so threateningly done, Mr. Thompson. However, no matter which way a possible referendum goes, the fact remains that not one referendum has been upheld constitutionally. Even *if* a referendum nullified the work of the senators, the courts (you know, that other part of our checks and balances system) will likely overturn it.

Donald Kagle

9:26 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

I hope that the issue comes to all of the people of Maryland for their vote. While our representaives are elected and are entrusted to speak for the people, there are times when the people must speak for themselves. Hot button issues like abortion, same sex marriage etc. need to be decided one way or another by the democratic principles of our country. The will of the people via the vote.
Don

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:49 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Civil rights should not be put to a public vote. If they were, much of the south would still be segregated. The rights of the minority must be protected from the tyranny of the majority.

Dave Ross

9:39 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

It's done. Let's move on: The Economy, Jobs, Education, Infrastructure, Poverty, Crime, Environment, Energy, Public Health...for starters.

Reply

Anne Welsh

9:51 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

You know, even though the majority of the voters in Harford County are Republican; there are a number of Democrats here. Patch.com, don't you think you could have presented the names of all the voters instead of just three Republicans? And Dems, please note how Mary-Delany James voted. This was an important issue for Maryland; she didn't support the Governor. I won't forget that when her time comes for re-election.
I'm excited to live in a forward thinking State and I appreciate all the Governor did to get this referendum on the ballot for the people of the State to vote for it. I feel pretty strongly that it will pass, and I hope so; but you never know. Please consider how this might impact ALL of your neighbors; not just those who fit a certain picture. Marriage rights open other rights, such as: tax implications, insurance coverage, ability to meet the definition of "family member." It's not just about the personal impact of a marriage vow.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:51 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Well said. I have communicated with Delegate James on numerous occasions over the years, and she has made it clear that she will not fight for the legal equality of Harford county's LGBT citizens.

Comment_arrow

Joe McCarthy

1:48 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Shes no Democrat and I urge all to dump her next election.I'm surprised she has not switched yet. Democrats unite and remove all the small minded,backward thinking,reps we have! And we all know your cow wouldnt let you mary that easy goat of yours #$%&*!

nowlookatwhatyouvedone

11:39 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Finally, now I can marry my billy-goat.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:53 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

nowlookatwhatyouvedone - It is scary how quickly you jump from a discussion about two people of the same sex getting married to your statement about marrying your goat. Do you think about marrying your goat often?

Peter Nincompoop

11:55 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

This bill will end state sanctioned discrimination. The united states governments began issuing marriage licenses was to prevent black men from marrying white women, and laws that prevent same sex couples from marrying does the same thing, discriminates against people and regulates homosexuals to a lesser status. I do not understand why in the 21st century we continue to allow bigots to influence laws that discriminate against anyone.
Regardless off your religious beliefs I wish everyone would stop the hated, discrimination and disrespect that is spread because of this issue. It upsets me that people use my religion to justify the bigotry. As a Roman Catholic I have looked past the Bibles alleged demonetization of homosexuality. The hatred and foul words that have been said hurts me deeply, for Christians who are taught to promote compassion and helping their fellow men and women this is a sad state. I do not believe that Jesus would ever turn away someone because of their sexual orientation. And it is because of the hatred some people have towards homosexuals and others that are "different" is the reason that the state now needs to define marriage and protect those that are discriminated upon.
I just hope that we can finally come together and accept each other for what we are.

Reply

Janice

11:58 am on Friday, February 24, 2012

Marriages would last a lot longer if they were Christian based. This will be my last comment because my values are so much different than most of the other comments that I see.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

1:31 pm on Friday, February 24, 2012

Oh, for sure! This is why we don't see any divorces resulting from marriages performed in a christian ceremony.

BTW Janice, the argument is about equality, not about whether homosexuals can procreate. Some heterosexuals (even the christians) do not bear children, and that does not make their marriage void. Should it?

Comment_arrow

Joe McCarthy

2:09 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Jim Bakker,Newt Gingrich,Jim Hagee,Jimmy Swaggart,Billy James Hargis,Marvin Gorman,Paul Crouch,Ted Haggard, and the list goes on of preachers whos marriages were christian based! Values like yours and the above mentioned crowd need to end as I think hypocrisy is the value you cherish most!

MdNatureGirl

7:08 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

This is a true sign that we have a lot of perverted people in society. Our government is not really protecting us after all. While most understand that it was the way that you were created inside it is still something you must know is not right. So , instead of trying to help yourself become healthy you are miserable and angry. It is just shameful to me that you insist that anyone that does not agree with you is wrong. You get so ugly and irrational about it as well. People have accepted that this is your choice. And you can fight to the end that it is not but really it is. While you are different inside others are too in other ways. We do what we can to become healthy people. I cannot believe that anyone would compare homosexuality to slavery! OMG! Delusion people. Get your minds healthy. Use them for that they were intended . Homosexual behavior has hurt a lot of innocent people . Mainly children. It makes me really sad!

Reply
Comment_arrow

St. John's Episcopal Church

7:02 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Please get your thoughts in order before spewing them! Homosexuality and pederasty are not the same thing. FACT: Most pederasts prey on those of the opposite gender.
1. If Jesus did not mention a subject, it cannot be essential to his teachings.
2. You are not being persecuted when prevented from persecuting others.
3. Truth isn’t like wine that gets better with age. It’s more like manna you must recognize wherever you are and whoever you are with.
4. You cannot call it “special rights” when someone asks for the same rights you have.
5. It is no longer your personal religious view if you’re bothering someone else.
6. Marriage is a civil ceremony, which means it’s a civil right.
7. If how someone stimulates the pubic nerve has become the needle to your moral compass, you are the one who is lost.
8. To condemn homosexuality, you must use parts of the Bible you don’t yourself obey. Anyone who obeyed every part of Leviticus would rightly be put in prison.
9. If we do not do the right thing in our day, our grandchildren will look at us with same embarrassment we look at racist grandparents.
10. When Jesus forbade judging, that included you.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

9:30 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

MdNatureGirl - You are right, bigotry is perverted. As for whether or not being gay is healthy, homosexuality is considered a normal part of human sexuality by the following medical and mental health associations: The American Psychological Association, the American Psychiatric Association, the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, the American Counseling Association, the Canadian Psychological Association, and the National Association of Social Workers.

As for people choosing to be gay, the American Psychological Association has stated that sexual orientation is not a choice.

Finally, how has homosexuality hurt children? Do you know what really hurts children? Judgmental people. Gay teens are 8 times as likely to attempt suicide than straight teens because of the rejection they experience from unaccepting families and the judgment they experience from hostile members of society.

Jessica

9:29 am on Saturday, February 25, 2012

hmmm . . . . last time i checked there were many children thriving in a home with same-sex parents - who are extremely devoted and loving parents for the children they wanted and planned to bring into this world. being gay or lesbian is NOT unhealthy, the only thing unhealthy is that memebers of the lgbt community grow up hearing such hate and negative comments from people like yourself.

Reply
Comment_arrow

MdNatureGirl

1:59 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Hmm... I do not believe you for one second. I bet you do not know many children thriving in a home with same sex parents! Also, how do you really know how those children feel? Yep! Just what I thought. Very immature mind you have. I do not hate gay people. I just do not agree with them. I am not angry . I just feel that it is selfish behavior on their part. Forcing their agenda onto children so that they as individuals can feel more normal and accepted also worries me. That is all. You cannot except that I do not agree with you. I am ok with that. But , I am not mean and negative because I do not agree. You just choose to believe that because I do not agree with you. So you therefor believe my comments to be hateful! I am ok with that. I know who I am! I am certainly not perfect.

Comment_arrow

Jessica

4:20 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

OK. i dont ? glad to hear you seem to know my life better than i do . . . i am not immature, i am a mother to wonderful children who are growing up in a very loving home with same-sex parents. i teach my kids to love all people and not to judge others based on things like race, sexual orientation etc. i dont believe anyone is "forcing their agenda onto children" just because they have different beliefs than you may have. it is not selfish to live an honest life an be who you are, and for lgbt youth and adults it's not always easy, especially when you fear the rejection of your family and the people you love. we all have our own opinions and you can say what you want but you cant possibly know the journey and life of another person or group of people.

Comment_arrow

St. John's Episcopal Church

7:01 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Well put, Jessica. I marvel at the way people against the idea will almost literally spew their feelings, such as MdNaturegirl, without a thought to actually looking into the "facts" they quote. Those of a more progressive bent have a duty to present proven facts, since it is our only ethical choice. At this, we are met with accusations of "anger." As Mr. Shakespeare once wrote, "Methinks thou dost protest too much." (sic)

Comment_arrow

Casey A

9:31 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

MdNatureGirl - "The research indicates that the children of lesbian and gay parents do not differ markedly from the children of heterosexual parents in their development, adjustment, or overall well-being." - The American Psychological Association.

Colin

1:13 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

So when is the last tine youve seen the male lions in the zoo having intercourse with one another, its not natural and its a perversion. If the whole world was gay how would we repopulate? Sad day for this state. thank you Harford county senators for voting for the right choice

Reply

Deeg

6:29 pm on Saturday, February 25, 2012

Has anyone actually read HB 438, the Civil Marriage Protection Act?

Reply

MdNatureGirl

7:39 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation. APA

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:34 am on Sunday, February 26, 2012

MdNatureGirl - "Human beings cannot choose to be either gay or straight." From an article written by the American Psychological Association in PsychCentral. You can verify at http://psychcentral.com/lib/2007/frequently-asked-questions-about-sexuality/all/1/

It is great that you are checking out the APA website. You can find information about homosexuality such as homosexuality being a normal part of human sexuality, high suicide rates among gay teens because of the judgment they feel from family and members of society, gay parents raising children that are as healthy as children raised by straight parents, etc.

Deeg

1:57 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

MdNatureGirl....can you please explain your comment "Forcing their agenda onto children so that they as individuals can feel more normal and accepted also worries me." Who is forcing what onto children?

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Foley

2:18 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

If a child had his/her choice to pick their parents 100% would pick a mother and father. So when two dads decide to take on a family it is the children that have the repercussions in our society, not the two dads. Argue with me all you want...your Wrong!!!

Comment_arrow

MdNatureGirl

6:18 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

You know exactly where I am going with that comment! Worries you. It should . Children look to adults ! It should concern you ! I am glad that it does worry you. Because it should! While I would typically say that no question is dumb. Your question is! If you cannot understand it . I am truly sorry for you !

Comment_arrow

Casey A

1:14 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

James - I didn't know you could speak for every child in existence, or know what they all think.

James Foley

2:29 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Homosexual partnerships tend to be unstable. For example, a study of 156 homosexual men (who were in relationships lasting between 1 and 37 years) discovered that none of the men who were in relationships longer than five years had been faithful to each other.[6] Yet another researcher found that the average cohabiting homosexual relationship lasts less than three years.[7] Besides higher rates of infidelity and separation, homosexual relationships also tend to involve more abuse, health problems, as well as drug and alcohol abuse.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

1:24 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

James - According to the American Psychological Association, "Despite social hostility toward same-sex relationships, research shows that many lesbians and gay men form durable relationships." They add that it is, "Reasonable to suggest that the stability of same-sex couples might be enhanced if partners from same-sex couples enjoyed the same levels of support and recognition for their relationships as heterosexual couples do, i.e., legal rights and responsibilities associated with marriage."

Your statistics come from The Family Research Council, which is hardly an objective group. This right-wing group describes their mission on their website as, "Family Research Council champions marriage and family as the foundation of civilization...Properly understood, "families" are formed only by ties of blood, marriage, or adoption, and "marriage" is a union of one man and one woman."

The American Psychological Association (APA) does not have a political agenda. Their mission, as found on their website, states, "APA seeks to advance psychology as a science, a profession, and as a means of promoting health, education, and human welfare."

Deeg

2:33 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

James Foley........Where do you get your information?

Reply
Comment_arrow

MdNatureGirl

6:22 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Well said Foley! The truth hurts! Afterall, Deeg, you want us all to accept that it is a relationship! Should be considered the same! Right? Well it is not!

Comment_arrow

Deeg

10:30 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012

MdNatureGirl.....I ask two questions and you jump to all kinds of conclusions! Calm down!

Peter Nincompoop

2:33 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

"If a child had his/her choice to pick their parents 100% would pick a mother and father.". This is the biggest load of bull I have ever read, a child has no idea what "normal" family is because there is no such thing, 1000 percent of the time the child would not know the difference between same sex parents and a female and male patent. Children only develop the distinction when bigots like you teach them. All a child needs is loving parents, either that be a male and a female, two males any number of parents regardless of sex will be fine if those parents love and care for them.
James for you claims to be valid, which they aren't you are also assuming that all hetrosexual parents are perfect, don't cheat, don't abuse their kids, don't do drugs and create perfect children. You live in a fantasy world james

Reply
Comment_arrow

MdNatureGirl

6:24 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

You are so delusional and selfish! Selfish , selfish, selfish.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

1:36 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

Peter - Well said! James, you might want to check out the American Psychological Association's Website which says, "The research indicates that the children of lesbian and gay parents do not differ markedly from the children of heterosexual parents in their development, adjustment, or overall well-being."

Comment_arrow

Deeg

3:03 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Read the article. It is just a point of view, nothing more, nothing less.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

1:52 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

Deeg - You are right. And it is a very biased point of view. The facts in the article come from the Family Research Council, a right-wing group who describes their mission on their website as, "Family Research Council champions marriage and family as the foundation of civilization...Properly understood, "families" are formed only by ties of blood, marriage, or adoption, and "marriage" is a union of one man and one woman."

The Southern Poverty Law Center, a nonprofit civil rights organization dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry, has stated, "The FRC (Family Research Council) often makes false claims about the LGBT community based on discredited research and junk science. You can read more about the FRC at http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/family-research-council

James Foley

2:38 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I said don't argue with me Nincompoop, you will not change my opinion.

Reply

James Foley

2:39 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

I think you mean "there is no such thing as normal" in your world!!!

Reply

Peter Nincompoop

2:39 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Keep your opinions to yourself than

Reply

James Foley

7:22 pm on Sunday, February 26, 2012

Any one ever see two 80 year old gay grandpa's on the front porch in their rocking chairs, holding hands reminiscing over what a great life they have had and so thankful for the wonderful children they have raised? Didn't think so. This will only ruin the "family values" that we have been so accustomed to enjoying.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Casey A

1:12 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

James Foley - According to AARP, "In the next several decades, LGBT adults age 65 and above is expected to double, reaching more than 3 million by 2030." I think you will see plenty of gay grandmas and grandpas on porches in upcoming years.

As for "Family values," I think teaching children that discrimination and bigotry are wrong is one of the best lessons they can learn.

MdNatureGirl

5:55 am on Monday, February 27, 2012

It is useless to even attempt to explain or try to reason with those who cannot see what is right in front of them. You keep sighting the APA . There will always be some group that gives you reason to behave the way you do. Just because we disagree does not make us bigots. If everyone believed it was ok to do drugs where do you think we would be as a society? I am going to concentrate my efforts in another direction. This is small and I see no reason to waste my time.

Reply

Casey A

10:50 pm on Monday, February 27, 2012

You are welcome to think whatever you want about homosexuality, but do not use your opinion to deny gays and lesbians legal equality.

As for your criticism that I keep citing (not "sighting") the American Psychological Association to support my posts, you cited the APA in one of your posts as well, which is great because researching what professional mental health associations have to say about homosexuality is one of the best ways to educate yourself about the issue.

You might be interested in what other professional mental health associations have to say about homosexuality. You can check the websites of the American Psychiatric Association, the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, the American Counseling Association, the Canadian Psychological Association.

Reply

Kate F.

10:44 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Just a question...everyone is picking on the Christian point of view, but since the Muslim population is increasing, what is their belief and opinion on the gay community and the rights of those in it? I haven't read anything about what their teachings are.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CB9678

11:27 am on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Because they don't get out and try to convince everyone that gay Marriage is against the Koran and expect everyone to believe as they do about it!

Comment_arrow

Casey A

4:37 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

I am a Christian, but I realize that since this is a civil marriage issue, not a religious marriage issue, what the Bible has to say about it is irrelevant.

franking

2:44 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

No, CB9678, they certainly don't do that in their countries. Trying to convince others of your point of view is free speech in a democracy. They just kill them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CB9678

3:02 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Even in our country I do not get lots of Muslims prostelitizing me and convincing me that there belief system is king!

James Foley

6:39 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

A man's disposition on the inside, i.e., what he possesses in his personality, determines what he is tempted by on the outside. The temptation fits the nature of the one tempted, and reveals the possibilities of that nature. Every man has the setting of this own temptation, and the temptation will come along the line of the ruling disposition. Temptation yielded to... is a proof that it was timidity that prevented the sin before."

Reply

James Foley

6:41 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

The Scriptures speak of three kinds of "trouble" for the believer: 1) Discipline, judgment, or rebuke from the Lord; 2) tests, trials, persecutions, suffering; and 3) temptations or attacks from Satan. So when trouble comes, what type is it? Is this God directly moving to correct me, or is this the promised persecution for following Christ, or have we allowed Satan access into our lives? Which kinds of trouble can be avoided? Which can't?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hey Zeus

10:03 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

"I distrust those people who know so well what
God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires."

Susan B Anthony

James Foley

6:41 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

"Keep us clear of temptation, and save us from evil."

Reply

James Foley

6:45 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

1 Cor 7:5 (Phi) [To married] Do not cheat each other of normal sexual intercourse... or you will expose yourselves to the obvious temptation of Satan.

Reply

James Foley

6:45 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

temptation feeds on weakness and bent desires

Reply

Casey A

6:48 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

James - I am gay, I am Christian, and God loves me just as I am. We are all children of God, gay and straight.

Reply

Andee S

7:29 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Everybody here is commenting that it is either a sad or happy day for marriage, depending on their views. I completely support this, because I support, believe in and love the friends and family members I have that are gay. I believe that I should hate the "sin," yet love the "sinner." The Bible also tells us in multiple places to not judge others (Matthew 7:3-5; Romans 2:1-4). So I will not judge anyone here, and I hope no one thinks I am.
Has anyone noticed, though, that marriage is a hot topic, but divorce rates come and go, practically ignored? Just an observation...

Reply

James Foley

7:33 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

I never said God did not love you. The question is "does he approve of your ways?"
I have nothing against gay people until you want to use the word "marriage" within your lifestyle and want to teach our children that what you do is right. Come up with your own word for marriage and then fight for the rights you believe you deserve under that word, whatever it may be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christine

8:35 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Apparently God does approve of marriage equality. The recent events in Maryland are prove of that. Who are we to question? I am a heterosexual woman married to a man and I support the right of two consenting adults to marry regardless of their gender.

Casey A

8:07 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

James - The Bible does not condemn homosexuality when it is put in historical and cultural context and read using reason as Jesus did.

Reply

James Foley

9:19 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Can't stop at trying to redefine marriage, now your going to rewrite the Bible? Where does it end?

Reply

Casey A

9:41 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

James Foley - It ends with equality and truth. The reason I come and participate in message boards about gay topics is I want other LGBT individuals to know that they are normal, and that God made them and loves them as they are. Too many gays and lesbians have had their faith stolen from them by the judgment they experience from conservative Christians.

Reply

Christine

10:26 pm on Tuesday, February 28, 2012

I can't help but think the Bible or concern for children have nothing to do with what some people are posting here. I suspect the thought of two gals or guys kissing creeps some people out. They are the freaks..... btw Patch, having these open forums is a nice idea, but it opens the door for bigots, racists, cat haters, ambulance chasers and such..... you might want to consider some monitoring.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Hey Zeus

10:17 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012

You are correct. People pick and choose the flavor of discrimination they practice to mask their own insecurities.

Take for instance: The Bible says in Leviticus 19:28, "Do not cut your bodies for the dead, and do not mark your skin with tattoos. I am the Lord."

Why aren't these same people picketing tattoo parlors?

Kevin Sudano

5:38 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

The people on this page that call themselves Christians and spit these Bible versus on here are, by doing it to promote hate and predjudice also spitting on the teachings of the man their religion is based upon. A great man who promoted Good will, peace, love, not judging others. I can't understand for the life of me why the idea of two women or two men loving eachother happily bothers you so much that you can seem to sleep at night. Sigmund Freud would suggest maybe its because you yourself may have those tendencies and are ashamed of them, others that you may just be unhappy and want others to be unhappy. The thoughts of two men and women who love eachother will possibly mess up the mind of a child they are raising is just plain dumb. You can honestly sit there and tell me they will mess up the minds if children worse then a family with a mother and father that promote domestic abuse both verbally and physically, or a family of a mother and father where a child is sexually abused or the parents are constantly under the influence of drugs or alcohol? I can not ever see a reason for predjudice and hated.

Reply

Mark

7:11 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

why is everyone so bothered about this? It will come up for a vote in Nov. and just like every other state that pushed it through against the will of the majority, it did not pass and it won't in MD. either

Reply

Casey A

7:42 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Mark - The majority of people in Maryland support gay marriage. If this comes up for a vote in november, I trust Marylanders will do the right thing and vote to uphold marriage equality.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

8:37 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

How could you possibly know that? Please don't let your feelings on the issue cloud your judgement. I am simply going on the facts as I read and see them. 31 States voted against Gay marriage when it was put up for a vote after the state legislators went against the will of the people and tried to pass it anyway.So I think your statement about most Md. people support Gay marriage is facetious.Look I have no horse in this race I am looking at it from a legislative point of view and the Govt State and Federal are supposed to be "by the people and for the people" and clearly on this issue they are not heeding this basic principe.

Comment_arrow

Adam

8:42 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Mark, as many people have noted, civil rights should not be decided by public vote. The framers were very worried about majority tyranny over minorities. If a majority of Marylanders voted to ban interracial marriage (as they may have 60 years ago), would you support that under your unqualified "by the people and for the people" principle?

Mark

9:20 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

good point, but as the great MLK said the creator made us all equal and that was the basis of the Civil Rights movement people of color being denied basic civil rights.n the other hand ,please correct me if I'm wrong most states already recognize civil unions between same sex partners and and protect their civil rights. I think most people that are against Gay marriage are simply trying to protect the institution and tradition of marriage between a man and women that can procreate.Most have no issue with laws that would recognize a civil union extending the right to gay people that traditional married people have.Of course you are going to have religious groups that will never recognize any union between same sex partners but they are not mainstream.

Reply

Adam

9:38 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Mark, unfortunately far less than half of the states provide for civil unions with the full benefits an opposite-sex couple would enjoy. Though I'm glad to hear that you would support equal rights for same-sex couples, regardless of the majority's vote.

Personally, though, I do think the word "marriage" makes a difference, and denying the right to marry (even if just a matter of semantics) stigmatizes homosexuals. But I do understand that's a more difficult issue, where reasonable minds can disagree.

Reply

Casey A

9:44 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Mark - Most states do not have civil unions. Currently in the U.S., 5 states have civil unions, 8 states have same-sex marriage, and 11 states have domestic partnerships which offers same-sex couples some rights and protections. That means 26 states do not offer any protections for same-sex couples.

The institution of marriage has changed throughout the years. Interracial marriage used to be illegal, and if it were put to a public vote, many states in the south would likely still likely outlaw interracial marriage.

As times change and we become a more just society, our societal institutions must change as well. Marriage equality is a civil right whose time has come.

Reply

Mark

9:54 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

I can see why some have a issue using the word marriage, but there is no reason why same sex partners should not be equally protected under law,at the minimum some sort of civil union or whatever term needs to be used should be available everywhere. Do you believe if you backed off the word marriage and used "civil union" you would be more successful in getting equal protection and civil rights "married" people enjoy and would the gay and lesbian community go for it?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam

10:13 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

That's a hard question--one far above my pay grade. I have no doubt that there are some against same-sex marriage that would be okay with civil unions. But judging by many people I have come across, that number is not so large. Earlier, Mark, you said, "Most have no issue with laws that would recognize a civil union extending the right to gay people that traditional married people have." Unfortunately I don't think this is the case. Many think even extending basic rights to same-sex couples is immoral, against their religion, etc. etc. I hope I'm wrong and you're right.

Comment_arrow

Phil Dirt

10:49 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Many people who are opposed to gay marriage are against it mainly for that one reason - the redefinition of the word 'marriage'. Civil unions with every last one of the rights and responsibilities of marriage would have been in place years ago if the self-selected leaders and spokespersons (another invented word) of the 'gay community' didn't push so hard for 'we want it and we want it under our terms exactly the way we want it or we'll resist.'

Stubborn people sometimes get what they deserve - a big delay in achieving their goals and many lingering hurt feelings on both sides along the way.

Comment_arrow

Casey A

11:46 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Phil - What you say is not entirely correct. The Catholic Church is opposed to both gay marriage and civil unions, and the Church has used its considerable resources to oppose both.

It is important to remember that we are talking about civil marriage, not religious marriage. Thus, what the Catholic Church or any religion has to say on the subject is irrelevant.

Casey A

10:20 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Mark - I understand where you are coming from. A part of me would be happy having civil unions if it means that my partner and I would have access to the over 1,100 federal benefits that come with marriage, but another part of me feels civil unions are "Separate but equal." Separate is inherently unequal, and I think it would marginalize the LGBT community by making us 2nd class citizens whose committed relationships do not deserve to be called "marriages."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

10:28 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

well good luck, I believe the resolution will fall somewhere in the middle and both sides won't get entirely what they want. BTW I am a conservative.Were not all homophobic religious radicals.

Casey A

11:33 pm on Saturday, March 3, 2012

Mark - Thanks for the conversation. I am a liberal, but I have many conservative friends, and we have some great discussions. I think the country would not be as polarized as it is if people would be open to dialogue. I would be open to changing the word "marriage" in the spirit of compromise as long as in included all of the rights and privileges of marriage. Take care!

Reply

Dave Lam

12:10 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

I strongly feel that the church and religion needs to stay out of government politics. if churches and religous groups insist on playing politics then I beleive that they should be releived of the "tax exempt" status that they now enjoy. In the state of Maryland the government could raise millions of dollars in revenue from this avenue. This would surely help with the budget shortfalls that we have. kill two birds with one stone. keep your religeon to yourself and stop forcing others to follow your beleifs.

Reply

Leave a comment