Pit Bull Ruling Has Domino Effect
Maryland's Court of Appeals ruled that pit bulls were 'inherently dangerous' earlier this year.
This report was provided by Lyndsey Wallen of Capital News Service.
Do you agree with the Maryland Court of Appeals that pit bulls are "inherently dangerous"? Tell us in the comments.
See also:
- Court of Appeals Won't Reconsider Pit Bull Decision
- Expanded Gaming Passes, Pit Bull Legislation Dies
- Pit Bull Bills Appear Headed in Different Directions
Dee
10:12 am on Friday, November 9, 2012
There are NO bad dogs - only BAD owners.................................
WhiteBeard
1:14 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012
The pit bulls are the same as any other dog
Linda Hoffecker
4:08 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012
No, I do not agree with the ruling. The only reason they are targeted is that they are able to hold onto whatever it is that they are biting, longer and harder than a few other dogs. Little dogs can be kicked away when pitt bulls cannot as a rule.
Bobbi
4:08 pm on Friday, November 9, 2012
I totally agree with the other two comments
patricia williams
1:48 pm on Sunday, November 25, 2012
Everybody need to wake the fxxk up these dogs are no more dangerous then any other dog. It is all in how you train people are losing there homes behind this stupid ruling. Why not ban guns they kill people everyday senseless killing.